Let's Never Agree on What 'Game of the Year' Signifies

The challenge of uncovering innovative games persists as the video game industry's greatest ongoing concern. Even in the anxiety-inducing era of corporate consolidation, growing revenue requirements, employee issues, extensive implementation of AI, digital marketplace changes, evolving player interests, salvation often comes back to the dark magic of "achieving recognition."

That's why my interest has grown in "honors" more than before.

Having just several weeks left in the calendar, we're deeply in GOTY season, a time when the minority of players not experiencing similar six F2P shooters every week tackle their backlogs, discuss development quality, and recognize that they too won't experience everything. There will be exhaustive annual selections, and we'll get "but you forgot!" comments to those lists. A gamer broad approval chosen by media, content creators, and fans will be revealed at annual gaming ceremony. (Industry artisans vote next year at the interactive achievements ceremony and GDC Awards.)

This entire celebration is in good fun — there are no right or wrong selections when it comes to the top titles of this year — but the stakes appear higher. Any vote cast for a "GOTY", whether for the grand main award or "Top Puzzle Title" in fan-chosen recognitions, opens a door for significant recognition. A moderate game that went unnoticed at debut might unexpectedly find new life by competing with better known (i.e. well-promoted) major titles. When last year's Neva popped up in consideration for an honor, I'm aware for a fact that tons of players suddenly sought to check a review of Neva.

Traditionally, award shows has created minimal opportunity for the breadth of releases launched annually. The difficulty to clear to review all seems like climbing Everest; about eighteen thousand games came out on Steam in last year, while just 74 games — including latest titles and live service titles to smartphone and VR specialized games — were included across the ceremony finalists. While commercial success, discourse, and storefront visibility drive what gamers play annually, there is absolutely not feasible for the structure of awards to adequately recognize the entire year of games. Nevertheless, potential exists for progress, if we can accept its significance.

The Expected Nature of Annual Honors

In early December, the Golden Joystick Awards, one of video games' longest-running awards ceremonies, revealed its contenders. Although the vote for top honor main category takes place early next month, it's possible to observe where it's going: The current selections created space for deserving candidates — massive titles that received praise for polish and ambition, successful independent games welcomed with blockbuster-level hype — but throughout numerous of honor classifications, there's a noticeable concentration of recurring games. In the vast sea of art and gameplay approaches, excellent graphics category makes room for several open-world games located in ancient Japan: Ghost of Yōtei and Assassin's Creed Shadows.

"If I was constructing a future Game of the Year in a lab," one writer noted in online commentary that I am enjoying, "it would be a Sony exploration role-playing game with mixed gameplay mechanics, companion relationships, and luck-based replayable systems that embraces gambling mechanics and has modest management base building."

Award selections, throughout organized and unofficial versions, has become expected. Several cycles of finalists and honorees has established a formula for which kind of refined extended experience can score a Game of the Year nominee. There are titles that never reach main categories or including "important" creative honors like Direction or Story, thanks often to formal ingenuity and quirkier mechanics. The majority of titles published in a year are likely to be relegated into specific classifications.

Case Studies

Imagine: Would Sonic Racing: Crossworlds, an experience with review aggregate marginally less than Death Stranding 2 and Ghosts of Yōtei, reach main selection of The Game Awards' top honor selection? Or maybe a nomination for best soundtrack (because the audio stands out and deserves it)? Doubtful. Excellent Driving Experience? Sure thing.

How outstanding must Street Fighter 6 have to be to earn top honor consideration? Might selectors evaluate distinct acting in Baby Steps, The Alters, or The Drifter and acknowledge the most exceptional voice work of this year absent AAA production values? Does Despelote's two-hour length have "sufficient" narrative to merit a (deserved) Excellent Writing recognition? (Additionally, should annual event need Top Documentary classification?)

Overlap in favorites over the years — within press, on the fan level — demonstrates a method increasingly skewed toward a certain extended game type, or independent games that landed with adequate attention to qualify. Not great for a field where finding new experiences is paramount.

{

Janet Fisher
Janet Fisher

A passionate historian and travel writer specializing in Italian medieval architecture and cultural heritage.